Blog 4: Article Critique

            “A Hungry Industry on Rolling Regulations: A Look at Food Truck Regulations in Cities Across the United States” by Crystal T. William is a scholarly article addressing the regulations in regards to food truck operations.

From Chicago to Los Angeles, food trucks abide by different rules due to the cities recent or long-time exposure. Various food trucks still work with the rules designed to regulate ice cream trucks while other cities are caught off guard by the rolling restaurants, allowing them to operate under the city’s standard sanitation requirements. On the other hand due to popular demand food trucks promote change of operating regulations. Maybe seen as a threat to surrounding restaurants, food trucks display characteristics of a hot commodity to the people occupying the city, forcing legislation to change how they allow food truck operators to run their businesses. Historically food trucks have been vibrant in cities across the nation to the point where they are subject to a majority of the same codes as a restaurant and are treated as equals to them. William’s goes into detail about these four topics in his well-crafted article.

            The article exemplifies some cities as being behind the time and others as contemporary due to how they respond, or have been responding, to what you might call a fad in the food industry.  William’s considers food trucks a trend that is here to stay and as a whole the author gets behind and wants to see a change in how food trucks are recognized. Consequently William’s wishes to inspire change in the outlook of food trucks, seeing them as establishments instead carts. Promoting the change and persuading others to do so is William’s sole argument.

            Being someone who is trying to get food trucks on JMU’s campus, I completely agree with Crystal William’s arguments. Food trucks innovate the food industry and should be not only supported but applauded by the public. A truck restaurant exudes possibilities for entrepreneurs and business owners alike, giving way to a new business or an expansion of an old one.

Food Truck Festival research

https://www.facebook.com/TheDankUTruck

Parking Regulations (university vendors, affiliate vendors)

Click to access JMU_Gate_Policies_and_Procedures.pdf

Harrisonburg food trucks (http://www.visitharrisonburgva.com/dining/food-trucks)

http://grilledcheesemania.com/contact-us/

http://mamascaboose.com

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Bakers-Dozen-Donuts/157159967706490

http://www.tacoselprimo.webs.com

JMU event management

http://info.jmu.edu/eventmanagement/

  • Go to vender and ask how flex are accommodated with vendors?

Parking Map

Click to access parkingmap.pdf

http://www.universitybusiness.com/article/food-trucks-pull-campus

Vendor Information

http://www.jmu.edu/procurement/vendor/vendor_info.shtml

JMU Homecoming Food Trucks

http://www.jmu.edu/events/homecoming/2013/index.shtml

Bakers Dozen Donuts

https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Bakers-Dozen-Donuts/157159967706490

Nicecream Factory

http://www.nicecreamfactory.com

JMU – Request A Facility

http://www.jmu.edu/athfacilities/specialevents.shtml

JMU Policy and Procedures

http://www.jmu.edu/JMUpolicy/alphalist.shtml

Outdoor Approval Form

Click to access JMU-Outdoor-Event-Approval-Form.pdf

Contacting Dining Services

http://www.campusdish.com/en-US/CSMA/JMU/ContactUs/

A hungry industry of rolling regulations

William, Crystal T. “A Hungry Industry On Rolling Regulations: A Look At Food Truck Regulations In Cities Across The United States.” Maine Law Review 65.2 (2013): 705. Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File. Web. 14 Nov. 2013.

Food Trucks Pull into Campus

http://www.universitybusiness.com/article/food-trucks-pull-campus

How America Became a Food Truck Nation

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/How-America-Became-a-Food-Truck-Nation.html

The Big Picture

http://www.foodservicedirector.com/trends/research/articles/big-picture-universities-glom-food-trucks

Pedestrian Safety: Off campus

– video research

– scholarly articles

– research on video makings

– public service announcements

– interviews

– data findings

We will need both a script and a story board

  • Using crosswalks/sidewalks
  • “J-walking” laws
  • Pedestrian day/night safety off campus

Jaywalking Accident Induces Coma

http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/detail?vid=15&sid=cd0a7aec-bb86-4102-b494-082d206909ce%40sessionmgr13&hid=16&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLGNvb2tpZSx1cmwsY3BpZCx1aWQmY3VzdGlkPXM4ODYzMTM3JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=gnh&AN=120425

The Breeze

http://www.breezejmu.org/article_ed1d0560-11c4-5fac-ba5f-78c547253e53.html?mode=jqm

Jaywalking accidents cause injuries to your body and your wallet

Mean girls clip

What do Jaywalking laws prohibit?

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZpMlm4xYG4)

Crossing before a signal (1)

Crossing not on a cross walk, a cross walk can be marked or unmarked (2)

If legal to crossoutside a crosswalk you must yeild to cars (3)

Crossing an intersection diagonally (4)

Walking in the street when there are sidewalks (5)

Start with a girl pressing the cross button

the clip from mean girls at 1:27 seconds

show someone jaywalking (1) then flash to the clip

show another violation (2) then flash to the clip in slow motion

show another violation (3) then flash to the clip in cycadelecs

show another violation (4) and so on with different variations…

 

The Power of Habit Critique

While discussing the two characters, Angie Bachmann and Brian Thomas, Charles Duhigg explores their habits, if they are held accountable and why.

            Angie, the gambler, was aware of the habits taking place either before or after she sunk into her impulsive streaks. She knew she would give in if the casino called and offered her a free stay, yet she kept answering the phone. This is what makes her responsible. The habit it’s self does not lay the groundwork for blame, yet the actions you take to prevent the habit from reoccurring.

            Brian Thomas, the murderer, was in the middle of a sleep terror when he committed his crime. In other words, had absolutely no control over his body, and was completely unaware of what was happening. There was no way to prevent the incident due to his sleepwalking condition. He is innocent because he was simply unaware.

            Duhigg is expressing through an extreme example, murder, that you are held responsible for your habits. As I read through the pages of the last chapter I found it interesting that the author compared an excessive gambler and a, for lack of a better term, murderer.

            Duhigg is genius for doing so. He takes something very extreme and compares it to something less extreme in hopes that you will understand the importance of acknowledging and changings habits. The gambler is held in higher blame then the murderer because she could not get a handle on her habit. This will shock the reader and make the idea stick. Repeating a bad habit you’ve recognized is worse then murder.

First he proposes the question of whether or not Brian Thomas should have been found guilty,

            “Brian Thomas murdered his wife, Angie Bachmann squandered her inheritance. Is there a difference in how society should assign responsibility?” (268)

            And then he brings it all back to habits, how you approach them, how you change them. Brian could not change his, Angie could.

            Charles Duhigg devotes this section of the text, and the book as a whole, to conveying this exact thought to the readers. He does this to explain in the most explicit terms possible why it is you are responsible for your actions.

            You do something bad; you know it’s bad, yet you do it again. That is the problem. Once you make a mistake you must learn from it.

            We all need to learn from our bad behaviors and find ways to make them better instead of living in a world of self-pity and loathing. Every human is capable of change in one-way or another.

            No one else can help you become the better person you want to be. If you are unhappy with an aspect of your life it is up to you to change it. The first step is to recognize it, and you must not be afraid to do that. Angie did everything besides address the problem at hand. She even moved to a different state to avoid casinos, yet her phone number was still on their calling list.

            Angie felt victim to her own habits and that was the problem. You are not the victim. This is what Charles Duhigg was trying to prove in The Power of Habit.

The Power of Habit: Chapter 9 Summary

            Chapter nine focuses mainly on two characters, Angie Bachmann and Brian Thomas. Both of these people suffer from habits that inhibit their everyday life.

            Angie is a stay at home mom that finds herself intensely bored day after day. She has nothing to fill her hours while her husband is at work and her daughters at school. To treat herself one afternoon she decides to get dressed up and go to the casino. She started doing this every Friday afternoon as a once a week reward. Angle went with strict rules for herself.

            Once Angie’s parents got sick in 2000 she started flying to Tennessee to see them every other week.  When she would return home she felt like her family didn’t need her, the only way to ease the tension was to hit the casino.

            At this point Angie has been gambling for years and gambled Monday, Wednesday, Friday. She didn’t have to think about her actions while paying anymore, she acted automatically. Harrah’s (her casino of choice) gave her a dangerous line of credit. These strict rules were no longer in place.

            Angie had a compulsion to gamble. She hardly knew it was a problem until it took over her life.

            By the summer of 2001 Bachmann was in $20,000 of debt that she kept secret from her husband. After this she tried to clean up her act, she thought she beat the compulsion, but she hadn’t. A couple years later she declared bankruptcy. Angie’s lawyer argued that she gambled out of habit, not choice.

            Three years after this both her parents died. She inherited $1 million. Pain stricken and feeling desperate Angie and her husband went to the casino for a “one time thing”. She was recognized by one of the managers at Harrah’s and immediately told them her whole story. Soon after this she started receiving offers from Harrah’s that she was unable to resist, free limos, airplane rides, suites, concerts, anything she wanted.

            March 18, 2006 Angie flew to Harrah’s on an invitation and lost everything her family had, including their house. Angie was found guilty for her habit in court.

            In 2010 Reza Habib, a cognitive neuroscientist, conducted a study. He observed brain activity as both social and pathological gamblers watched the wheels of a slot machine. There were three outcomes, win, loss, and near miss. To a pathological gambler, the wins looked the same as a near miss. This is because the near miss triggers their habit to put down another bet. The areas of the brain that Habib watched in this experiment were the basil ganglia and the brain stem, the regions where habits reside (as well as behaviors related to sleep terrors start).

            Which brings me to Brian Thomas. Brian was married to a woman he loved for 14 years. He also suffered from sleepwalking. He woke up one night to his wife dead on the ground, and he had killed her. He had been sleeping and mistook his wife for an intruder.

            While you are sleepwalking the part of your brain that monitors your behavior is asleep, but the parts that control complex activities are awake.

            Thomas was tried as not guilty. Technically he was not aware of what he was doing. In his case his habit was so powerful it overwhelmed his capacity to make choices.

            During this episode Brain was actually having a sleep terror. This is when the brain shuts down except for the most primitive regions. The brain under a sleep terror looks very similar to the brain following a habit. The behaviors of people during sleep terrors are habits. The fight or flight habit is cued and there is no possibility of conscious decision.

            The judge found Thomas not responsible for his habit, innocent.

            Some of the same arguments that were made for Brain Thomas were also made for Angie Bachmann. They both were under the power of habit, both unable for decision making to intervene, and both felt a sense of extreme guilt.

            There was one difference though, Angie was aware of her habit. The main point of this chapter, and book, is to explain that once you are made aware of your habit, it is your responsibility to change it. Any habit can be changed once we know how they function. To take control of your habits you need to understand your cues and rewards that drive them, and find an alternative. Both Angie and Brain acted automatically, but only Angie had the ability to change.